A lot of things he explained here and you'd a 1h 43min video to wow classic gold discuss it and I can just sort atm but I wounder if he's even heared what they advised us until now, such as the Blizzcon interview and much more. The token will make people not having to work because of their own stuff. Like who did struggle and work to it and who opened up their pockets. Sounds he couldn't care much about WoW Classic, but he'll play with it for those who do.

Hey guys, only need to go on the list and say that I totally disagree with altering vanilla. However, tea is arguing a stance, he is arguing what may happen. I am not sure what this didn't undergo. He believes the wow token may happen because Activision sucks and the purpose about endgame changes are what he believes will make vanilla more accessible. I've read a great deal of opinions and individuals get VERY defensive when people question exactly what"WoW Classic" might/should be. I believe Tea Thyme made lots of great points. Lets face it, developers do not decide what ultimately enters the game....they just implement the"program" created by the decision makers of the company. There'll be changes, there are already changes intended, it is just how deep will the changes go??

I found myself agreeing with a few things and disagreeing with other people and its great to see the other view on matters. Personally I am more of a #nochanges individual but what I wish to see in the very long term is merely community run servers in which folks can lawfully create their own content(so long as your sub is active) for other people to light's hope gold buying enjoy ( probably will never happen tho).