The purpose of this passage is to consider the statement “actionable claim” or “choses in
operation” since the same is described to be “goods” under the proposed GST law as
performed before the Parliament and won presidential assent this year. The phrase
“Actionable” corresponding to Black’s Law Dictionary means “That for which a plan will
remain, providing legal ground for a movement”. In English constitution it is recognized as
“chosen in action” or “objects in action”. The term ‘chose in action#39; in the actual sense means
something recoverable by proceeding as varied to ‘chose in possession’ which is a part of
which an individual may have personal custody.
Thus a human can maintain two classes of ideals in relationship to actionable claims. One is
convenient to equities in his possession known as choses in possession in act. The
alternative one is properties over which the human holds merely a right of response without
custody and accepted in law as choses in action. In this brief article, we are concerned about
actionable GST claims.
The analysis assumes importance when we examine the fact that GST law excluded
actionable claims from the interpretation of “goods” whereas it is exactly included in the
interpretation of goods in the SGST ACT. It is noticeable that there is huge revenue potential
since the organization of “securitization “is booming in India. Many banks and Non-Banking
Financial Companies assign their needs or loan portfolios to a SPV (Special Purpose
Vehicle) for extensive consideration and the decision makers perhaps may have a look at
such copies of transactions. Therefore, it is of ultimate concern that we should have a logical
idea about the law pertaining to actionable claim.
1. DEFINITION - ACTIONABLE CLAIMS:
Corresponding to section 2(1) “actionable claim” must have the same sense as given to it in
section 3 of the Handover of Ownership Act, 1882. Therefore, we shall consider the
definition under the Transfer of Property Act 1882.
Section 3 of the Transfer of property Act 1882 - actionable claim as follows.
“Actionable Claim is an assert to any debt, other than a due secured by debt of immobile
property or by hypothecation or agreement of moveable equity, or to any profitable interest in
moveable ownership not in custody either substantive or constructive, of the applicant, which
the civilian courts agree as affording grounds of relief whether such debt or favorable interest
be existent, accumulating or conditional or contingent”. When we evaluate the explanation it
is explicit that the term “actionable claim” has got 2 limbs. One is that it is a hold to any
detached debt. The second limb is about claim to profitable interest in movable goods not in
exact or constructive possession of the applicant which shall be recognized as allowing
ground for relief by a civilian court. Those two divisions of claims can be existent,
forthcoming, unforeseen or limited.
1. CLAIM TO ANY DEBT:
It is very evident that an actionable call is a claim to a detached debt since the
explanation specifically excludes mortgages secured by mortgage of immovable
properties as well as debts guaranteed by hypothecation or word. It likewise
includes a call for to any profitable interest in movable wealth for eg proportion of
a partner’s share in the business property subject to the condition that such
movable goods are not in physical or constructive possession of the applicant
and pointed to further condition that the call for shall lay on grounds which civil
courts would grant as docks for granting relief. The deficits or constructive
interest may be existent, accumulating, unforeseen or tentative.
1. ACTIONABLE CLAIMS – SOME Illustrations:
We shall now consider some of the judicial judgments by courts on what calls for can be
recognized as “actionable claims”. The successive items are held to be actionable
claims and the connected case laws are given in brackets.
Obligations of rent were held to be a deficit.
Lottery ticket is an actionable claim
An ideal to an aid of a contract
Legal to credit in a provident fund
Negotiable factors like bills of transaction, notes etc. Bank Insurance claims,
Right shares or opportunity to purchase stakes in a cooperative property, Right
under a certificate.
1. NON-ACTIONABLE CLAIMS:
The subsequent elements are held to be non-actionable claims. A claim to mere profit is not
a capital as it is not got rid of. A judgment for debt is not an actionable claim since it was an
obligation prior to the announcement and no claim is necessary to apply the claim. The
rights to reclaim damages for infringement of shrink. A copyright/Trademark. Where a
directive provides for a subsequent statute, this future law is likewise not actionable claim.
1. ASSIGNMENT OF ACTIONABLE CLAIMS
An actionable claim may be turned over by means of sale, debt, grant or exchange etc. But
the estimated transfer or distribution of an actionable claim must be demonstrated by a
mechanism in writing signed by the transferor or his strength of attorney. The position can be
made by a commercial at the back of a document holding the actionable claim is abundant
and no separate detail is necessary. The transfer would be competent from the register of
the execution of the assignment and would confer on the transferee all the desirables and
remedies of the transferor.
After the supply, the transferee is objected to all the responsibilities and investments to
which the transferor was administered at the date of the transfer. The transferee in
his concern, must provide notice of the transfer to the borrower, as early as possible. Once
the borrower receives the notification of assignment, he becomes amenable to pay the debt
only to the transferee. Such a consideration must be in reviewing and it must present the
name and call of the transferee. There is no space limit for issuing the notice.
1. LIABILITY TO VAT
Having dealt with the definition and practice of actionable claims let us consider about the
tax liability arising out of the handover of actionable claims. We have previously noticed that
the word “goods” under GST actionable claims. But the essential point to be remarked is that
it is not referred to as “goods” under the business of goods act 1930 and this feature may
raise up differences in the terms to come. Let us look at the explanations under the general
rule on purchase of properties and the individual tax measures such as GST and CST Act
1956.
1. DEFINITION OF “GOODS UNDER CGST:
Category 2(1) of CGST Act specifies “goods” to mean everything which is of movable
property other than money and guarantees but includes actionable claim, flourishing crops,
barley and objects attached to or farming part of the field which are signed to be detached
before supply or under an undertaking of supply.
- DEFINITION OF “GOODS” UNDER CST ACT 1956:
“Goods” combines all elements, commentaries, products and all new kinds of movable
property, but does not receive newspapers, actionable claims, stocks, proportions and
guarantees. [Section 2 (d)]
1. EVALUATION OF THE VARIOUS DEFINITIONS
On running through the explanations above it is evident that GST law includes actionable
claims in the interpretation of goods whereas purchase of goods Act and CST act prohibits
the same. We can ignore the CST Act since the same shall get into GST and hence not
suitable. But the jolt of the definition excluding actionable claims under Sale of Goods Act
may pose some obstacles.
Name Of the Author: Ramya Tummala, I am Passionate Article Writer having Experience of 4 years in writing, Currently I am Working With Kanakkupillai, Who are Best Accounting Firm in India - Company Registration Online in India GST Registration Online In India
